Monday Night Class · Monday, October 12, 2026
A Helper Against Him

Hashem made the woman an ezer kenegdo, a helper opposite the man, and Rashi reads it both ways: if he merits, she is a helper; if not, she is against him. Why would the same woman be one or the other, and what does it take to merit? The Maharal's answer: man and woman are equals and opposites, and two opposites either fuse into the strongest bond there is or push each other away.
The parsha background— tap to read the review first
Seventy-two hours
First, a quick recap of Parshas Bereshis, to take one lesson home from it. The world was created in six days, and only in the daytime: twelve hours a day, seventy-two hours in all (Zohar 2:116, brought in the Me'am Loez).
That is where the Kabbalistic practice comes from, that one who sins fasts seventy-two hours, three days and three nights. A person is a world in miniature. When he sins he brings creation down with him, and seventy-two hours of fasting repair the damage done to what was made in seventy-two hours. People don't do teshuvah that way today, but it shows how the laws of the Kabbalah are built.
Hashem finished His work at the exact moment the sixth day ended. We add a buffer before Shabbos because we can't know the precise moment one day ends and the next begins; Hashem needs no buffer. At that moment He was in the middle of creating the shedim, the demons. Shabbos came before they reached a physical body, so they stayed part human and part angel (brought in the Me'am Loez). Hashem intended them to be that way, but the lesson for us is simple: when Shabbos is coming and there's still work to do, you stop.
When the evil inclination moved inside
וְהַנָּחָשׁ֙ הָיָ֣ה עָר֔וּם מִכֹּל֙ חַיַּ֣ת הַשָּׂדֶ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר עָשָׂ֖ה יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהִ֑ים וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ אֶל־הָ֣אִשָּׁ֔ה אַ֚ף כִּֽי־אָמַ֣ר אֱלֹהִ֔ים לֹ֣א תֹֽאכְל֔וּ מִכֹּ֖ל עֵ֥ץ הַגָּֽן׃
The serpent was the most cunning of all the wild beasts that God had made. [The serpent] asked the woman, "Did God really say that you may not eat from any of the trees of the garden?"
הֲל֤וֹא אִם־תֵּיטִיב֙ שְׂאֵ֔ת וְאִם֙ לֹ֣א תֵיטִ֔יב לַפֶּ֖תַח חַטָּ֣את רֹבֵ֑ץ וְאֵלֶ֙יךָ֙ תְּשׁ֣וּקָת֔וֹ וְאַתָּ֖ה תִּמְשׇׁל־בּֽוֹ׃
If you do good, will there not be special privilege? And if you do not do good, sin is crouching at the door. It lusts after you, but you can dominate it."
The serpent wasn't a demon. The Angel of Death disguised himself as the most intelligent animal of the time, the serpent (Pirkei deRabbi Eliezer 13, brought in the Me'am Loez). The Torah calls it the slyest of all the animals, and being sly takes intellect. It tricked Chava into eating from the tree, she fed her husband, and the serpent, Chava and Adam were each punished with ten curses (brought in the Me'am Loez).
One of the serpent's curses was losing its hands and feet (brought in the Me'am Loez). It was supposed to be humanity's great servant, carrying messages and delivering whatever we needed. The Gemara mourns "a great servant lost to the world" (Sanhedrin 59b). Now we have to buy robots instead.
Before the sin, the evil inclination was outside a person: a voice telling you, "Do something wrong, eat from the tree," while your own instincts wanted only good. After the sin, the instinct itself turned. Evil was no longer outside a person but part of him, and that is much stronger. By Kayin the Torah says, "sin is crouching at the door": always waiting to get a person.
So what did Chava see in eating from the tree? My rabbi in Israel, Rabbi Berkowitz, explained it this way. A voice from outside is like peer pressure. It isn't crazy hard; you can put your fingers in your ears. Once the pull is inside you, it is much harder to overcome since you can end up identifying with it, therefore the reward for overcoming it is so much greater. Chava saw that: if my instinct were evil and I still did good, how much greater I would become.
Chava gives it to Adam
וַיֹּ֖אמֶר הָֽאָדָ֑ם הָֽאִשָּׁה֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר נָתַ֣תָּה עִמָּדִ֔י הִ֛וא נָֽתְנָה־לִּ֥י מִן־הָעֵ֖ץ וָאֹכֵֽל׃
The man replied, "The woman that you gave to be with me—she gave me what I ate from the tree."
Hashem had told Adam that no one may eat from the Tree of Knowledge. Chava ate, and then she was afraid of what would happen to her, and that Adam would marry someone else. Jealousy kicked in, and she wanted him to eat too (Bereishis Rabbah 19:5, brought in the Me'am Loez).
He refused, and there are different opinions about what happened next. Some say she squeezed the fruit into his drink. Some say she cried and screamed until he gave in (Pirkei deRabbi Eliezer 13; Bereishis Rabbah 19:5, brought in the Me'am Loez).
When Hashem asked, Adam took no personal responsibility: "The woman You gave to be with me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate." That was a bad claim. Hashem is the master, her master too. When a servant tells you to do one thing and the master tells you another, you listen to the master.
Chava's test
וּמִפְּרִ֣י הָעֵץ֮ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בְּתוֹךְ־הַגָּן֒ אָמַ֣ר אֱלֹהִ֗ים לֹ֤א תֹֽאכְלוּ֙ מִמֶּ֔נּוּ וְלֹ֥א תִגְּע֖וּ בּ֑וֹ פֶּן־תְּמֻתֽוּן׃
But of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, God said, 'Do not eat it, and do not [even] touch it, or else you will die.'"
Hashem told Adam not to eat from the tree. He never said not to touch it. Yet Chava tells the serpent, "Do not eat it, and do not touch it." Who added it? Some say Adam did: he thought she might not be careful enough and might eat from it, so to keep her safe he told her not even to touch it. When the serpent pushed her against the tree and nothing happened, she believed him (Avos deRabbi Nasan 1, brought in the Me'am Loez). We learn from here that a fence around the Torah has to be known as a fence, not taught as the law itself. Others say she added it herself.
The Kli Yakar explains why she would add it (Kli Yakar, brought in the Me'am Loez). The serpent saw Adam and Chava together and desired her. To take her, he had to get rid of Adam (Bereishis Rabbah 18:6, brought in the Me'am Loez). So he started a conversation with Chava, and he told her that Hashem Himself ate from this tree, and that is how He creates worlds; He forbade it to them so they wouldn't become like Him and He would keep His exclusive position (Bereishis Rabbah 19:4, brought in the Me'am Loez).
Chava thought it was a strong claim. But what did the serpent really want: her good, or her, with Adam out of the way? So she made up the rule that touching the tree kills, and set a test. She assumed the serpent didn't know the law. If he pushed Adam into the tree, she would know he was trying to get rid of Adam and get to her. If he pushed her into the tree, he was risking her life, so he couldn't be after her, and he must be sincere.
He pushed her into the tree, and she concluded that eating from it really was for her best. Even then she didn't eat the fruit itself. Hashem said not to eat the fruit, so she tasted the rind (Tzeror HaMor, brought in the Me'am Loez). It was so good that she took a big bite, and reality changed. That's when she went to Adam.
Adam names the animals
וַיִּ֩צֶר֩ יְהֹוָ֨ה אֱלֹהִ֜ים מִן־הָֽאֲדָמָ֗ה כׇּל־חַיַּ֤ת הַשָּׂדֶה֙ וְאֵת֙ כׇּל־ע֣וֹף הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וַיָּבֵא֙ אֶל־הָ֣אָדָ֔ם לִרְא֖וֹת מַה־יִּקְרָא־ל֑וֹ וְכֹל֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִקְרָא־ל֧וֹ הָֽאָדָ֛ם נֶ֥פֶשׁ חַיָּ֖ה ה֥וּא שְׁמֽוֹ׃
God had formed every wild beast and every bird of heaven out of the ground. He [now] brought [them] to the man to see what he would name each one. Whatever the man called each living thing [would] remain its name.
וַיִּקְרָ֨א הָֽאָדָ֜ם שֵׁמ֗וֹת לְכׇל־הַבְּהֵמָה֙ וּלְע֣וֹף הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וּלְכֹ֖ל חַיַּ֣ת הַשָּׂדֶ֑ה וּלְאָדָ֕ם לֹֽא־מָצָ֥א עֵ֖זֶר כְּנֶגְדּֽוֹ׃
The man named every livestock animal and bird of the sky, as well as all the wild beasts. But the man did not find a helper who was compatible for him.
Before Chava was created, Hashem brought all the animals to Adam to name. The angels had said that they were more intelligent than this human. Hashem brought the animals to the angels and asked them to name them, and they didn't know. Then He brought them to Adam, and Adam gave every one its name (Bereishis Rabbah 17:4, brought in the Me'am Loez).
To name something in Lashon HaKodesh, the language of the Torah, is to know what it is: the word is the essence of the thing. If a Kabbalist who had never seen a table were told there's a shulchan over there, he could go into the depth of its letters, shin, lamed, ches, nun, picture it, and build one. Betzalel, who built the vessels of the Mishkan, had that understanding: he knew how to combine the letters with which heaven and earth were created, and his name means "in the shadow of God" (Berachos 55a). Adam, from the name alone, understood the depth of every creature, and the names he gave are the names to this day.
Then Adam saw that every animal had a partner, male and female. Where was his? Hashem said, "It is not good for man to be alone; I will make him a helper." Hashem wasn't changing His mind. It was all part of the plan, built into creation from the start (brought in the Me'am Loez).
A helper, or against him
וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהִ֔ים לֹא־ט֛וֹב הֱי֥וֹת הָֽאָדָ֖ם לְבַדּ֑וֹ אֶֽעֱשֶׂה־לּ֥וֹ עֵ֖זֶר כְּנֶגְדּֽוֹ׃
God said, "It is not good for man to be alone. I will make a compatible helper for him."
"It is not good for man to be alone; I will make for him an ezer kenegdo": a helper, kenegdo, opposite him, even against him.
Rashi is the first stop when you learn the Torah, and what he gives is pshat, the straight understanding: the first of the levels at which a verse is read (pshat, remez, drash, sod). Here Rashi says: זָכָה – עֵזֶר; לֹא זָכָה – כְּנֶגְדּוֹ לְהִלָּחֵם. If he merits, she is a helper. If he does not merit, she is against him, to fight him (Rashi on Bereshis 2:18, from Yevamos 63a).
The Maharal: why Rashi brings it
The Maharal, one of the greatest Jewish thinkers since the Rishonim, points something out in his commentary on Rashi, the Gur Aryeh. Rashi is supposed to tell me how to read the verse. "If he merits, a helper; if not, against him" doesn't sound like pshat. It sounds like a nice dvar Torah for the Shabbos table. So why does Rashi bring it here?
The Maharal's answer: because otherwise, why does the verse say kenegdo at all? "I will make him a helper" would have been enough. Kenegdo tells us what kind of helper this is. That is pshat, he says, and if it were not, Rashi would not have brought a Midrash that isn't close to the plain meaning (Gur Aryeh on Bereshis 2:18).
There is a helper who is never against you: a father to a son, a son to a father. They never butt heads; there is never a contradiction between them. This helper is a different kind. האשה שהיא חשובה ושקולה כמו האיש: the woman is as important as the man, his equal. She helps the man, כי האיש מביא והאשה מתקנת לו: the man brings, and the woman fixes it for him. That is called ezer kenegdo. And so אם לא זכה – היא כנגדו לגמרי: if he doesn't merit, she is against him completely. A father and son are never against each other.
So there are two questions. Why is it not good for a man to be alone? And what is the woman's role in the marriage, this dichotomy of a helper who can be against him?
Two creations, two roles
וַיֹּ֘אמֶר֮ הָֽאָדָם֒ זֹ֣את הַפַּ֗עַם עֶ֚צֶם מֵֽעֲצָמַ֔י וּבָשָׂ֖ר מִבְּשָׂרִ֑י לְזֹאת֙ יִקָּרֵ֣א אִשָּׁ֔ה כִּ֥י מֵאִ֖ישׁ לֻֽקְחָה־זֹּֽאת׃
The man said, "Now this is bone from my bones and flesh from my flesh. She shall be called Woman (Ishah) because she was taken from man (ish)."
Everything in creation has a role. With a good enough model, or years of research like the people before the Flood who lived almost a thousand years, you could understand how every species sustains the world, the way the honeybee sustains a whole ecosystem.
The Maharal points out that in no other language are the names of man and woman alike. Only in Lashon HaKodesh does Adam say, "She shall be called ishah, because she was taken from ish." In Aramaic they are gavra and itta, in Spanish hombre and mujer (Gur Aryeh on Bereshis 2:23). And man and woman are not two humans who are basically the same. They are two separate creations, and they don't operate the same way.
There is a role for the man and a role for the woman. The man's role is to bring raw materials: biologically, in the mundane world and in the spiritual world. He goes out to the field with his hatchet, cuts the wheat and brings it home. Rabbi Yosi asked Eliyahu how a woman helps a man. Eliyahu answered: a man brings wheat; does he chew the wheat? He brings flax; does he wear the flax? She lights up his eyes and stands him on his feet (Yevamos 63a). She takes the wheat and makes it into bread. She takes the flax and makes it into clothing.
To bring a baby into the world, the man can't bring a baby. He brings the raw material, and the woman takes it and builds the baby. She is a nurturer, but the Maharal's word is mesakenes: she is a fixer. That is why it isn't good for a man to be alone. He can bring materials, but he can't produce. Have you ever seen a single man's fridge? Or his dorm room? There's nothing nice in it.
Opposites make the strongest bond
So what does Rashi mean by "if he merits"? It means if you work at the marriage. Put effort into the marriage, and she is your helper. Don't put work in, and she is against you.
Why? The Maharal brings something deeper about a man and a woman. הזכר והנקיבה הם שני הפכים: male and female are two opposites. When they merit, they join into one complete power, because Hashem, who makes peace between opposites, connects them. When they don't merit, the very fact that they are opposites makes her against him (Gur Aryeh on Bereshis 2:18). Two opposites can bond with extreme power, or not fuse at all.
Think of magnetism: opposite charges attract, like charges repel. That is why, of all the Noahide laws, people steal and people kill, but incest hardly seems to be an issue. What is too familiar, too much the same, repels. There has to be something different, a different charge. It's the same reason people run after something new.
Working at it: get off your horse
What does it mean to work at fusing? Since they are two different creations, what isn't good about a man alone is that he sees the world only through his own eyes. Here is a metaphor I saw in a book. A huge map of the whole world covers a wall, and over it hangs a sheet of paper with one tiny hole. Someone asks whether you've seen the map of the world, and you point to the hole: right here. Take the paper off, and there's an entire world. You were basing all your logic and all your decisions on that one tiny hole.
Everyone sees through their own two eyes, but a man thinks he knows. That's the ego of a man: I know what's best, I know the reality of things, I know what's up. Men don't like to ask directions; we'd rather be lost for forty years. Then he gets married and thinks: I'll teach her, I'll show her the world. I'll tell her exactly how to fry the onions: a little higher, a little lower, I know much better.
The way to work at a marriage is to understand that the person you married is, as the Maharal says, an equal who sees the world in a completely different way. Most people's default is to decide their spouse is just not as smart. It's much easier to dismiss them than to lower your ego and say: maybe they came to this from a different perspective. Get off your horse and ask how they came to this conclusion. This is a human being I'm married to, a separate entity, so what is their operating system? It's the same exact thing on the woman's side.
When both of them work at it, he brings the raw materials and she understands what he's intending with them. They have common goals; they run on the same operating system. So she brings back exactly what he was after. That is zachah: ezer, a helper, because everything she produces is how you want it. When nobody works at it, either she isn't tapping into what he's trying to get to, or he isn't tapping into what she's about, her goals in life and her direction. She brings back a product he never ordered: I brought the raw materials for this, and you're giving me that. That is kenegdo, against him.
These are the fundamentals of a working marriage, and they assume two people who are emotionally healthy. With two healthy people, even one of them can repair a marriage. The man's nature is to bring, so when he sets the tone, she can answer it.
In Aramaic a wife is called d'veisehu, from bayis, a home: the woman builds the home.
Become whole first
For people who aren't emotionally healthy, my favorite book is You Are the One You've Been Waiting For. Why do people like drugs? Because they numb the pain; I don't have to think about everything I'm carrying inside. Clubbing, this, that: it's all external stimulation.
Then it's time to settle down, and a person looks for meaningful external stimulation: a wife, or for a woman, a husband, who will be my support. Not support in a healthy way; support in a dependent way. Once they marry, that person can't always be the helper. When they aren't in the mood to support you, you start coming up with ploys to manipulate them and make them feel bad for not being there for you, and that dismantles the marriage.
The book's point is that the craving and the fulfillment you're looking for are in yourself. Repair yourself, become healthy, and then get married.
What to look for
Step one: become that person. If you're a guy, become masculine: be the provider. I bring to the table; I'm not expecting someone else to bring.
Step two: look for the opposite charge. As a guy, I want someone who, when I bring the materials, is interested in connecting with me: the same values, the same things in life, going in the same direction, someone with whom those two opposite forces can fuse into something so powerful. If she's just like me and we love the same exact things, that's nice, but there's got to be an opposite charge. A woman looks for the opposite too: she fills her role as the builder, the one who takes the man's raw materials and builds the family, in every aspect, and she looks for a provider.
There's no average marriage. A so-so marriage is one where some days you're tapped in together and some days you're opposites. A good marriage is when you're tapped in together.
Step three: respect. When you're dating, ask: is this someone I respect? That means I don't think they're dumb. When they do something there's a reason behind it, an operating system that's actually really good, a different perspective. And be willing to work at understanding it.
On a date you're not really showing up yet; you're seeing whether it can work. It's in the marriage that you show up.
She fixes it
The raw materials aren't only physical things. I didn't dress that nicely before I got married: a pair of pants from Old Navy, a little Aeropostale, brown shoes with black pants. You get married, and she is mesakenes, the Maharal's word: she fixes it. She knows where everything goes, and it all comes out so much nicer. Emotions too: when a man is all over the place, without direction, she refines him and calms him down.
One flesh
עַל־כֵּן֙ יַֽעֲזׇב־אִ֔ישׁ אֶת־אָבִ֖יו וְאֶת־אִמּ֑וֹ וְדָבַ֣ק בְּאִשְׁתּ֔וֹ וְהָי֖וּ לְבָשָׂ֥ר אֶחָֽד׃
A man shall therefore leave his father and mother and be united with his wife, and they shall become one flesh.
Marriage is the path to completion. Hashem created Adam and Chava as two halves of one, joined back to back: the man walked forward and the woman walked backward, and then Hashem split them into two people (Berachos 61a, brought in the Me'am Loez). A complete person is not one person; a complete person is a man and his wife.
When you fill those roles well and understand the other one's perspective, the Torah says, "and they shall become one flesh." Two opposites, one unit, and that is the most powerful thing there is.
"One who has found a wife has found good" (Mishlei 18:22). Why found? Because it is something that was lost from you, and now you're finding it (Kiddushin 2b).
When a person taps into this, they will have the best marriage. There's no in-between: either you're tapped in, or it's kenegdo, because a person didn't work at it. Opposite charges either work amazingly or don't work at all, and you see it: people with great marriages, and people without them.
Raw materials of the spirit
So all a man has to do is make money? No. Raw materials are physical, money, and they are also spiritual. He learns Torah, he learns Gemara, and he brings it home. She takes that spirituality, brings it down to practice, and gives it over to the next generation, to the children.
He can only do that well if he really understands her and supports her, physically and emotionally. Then she receives the raw materials well and can build with them. If not, there's a disconnect, as if he thinks she isn't as smart, and the transfer to the one receiving it breaks down. She worries he's only trying to take from her, not to give, and she can't build.
So many times I bring an idea home and tell my wife, and she asks sharp questions, boom, boom, boom, and refines it. She knocks off the sharp corners, and what comes back is a product that makes sense: that's how we're going to go. She doesn't take it as information. She turns it into the values of the home, she lives by it, and the kids see it and go with it.
The one thing to take away
Your spouse is your equal and your opposite: get off your horse and learn how they see the world, and the two of you become one.
English from The Living Torah by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, used with the permission of the Kaplan family. Hebrew: Miqra according to the Masorah (CC BY-SA).